Our tendency to recall best the last and first items in a list is called the __________ effect.

Grow as a designer

Test your design knowledge and get valuable insights
on how to improve and advance your design career.

Learn more

Powered by Learning Loop

  1. Design Patterns
  2. Perception and memory
  3. Comprehension
  4. Serial Positioning Effect

Problem summary

We have a tendency to recall the first and the last items in a series best

Example

Our tendency to recall best the last and first items in a list is called the __________ effect.

The recency effect disappears when people think about other matters for thirty seconds after the last item in the list is presented.

Usage

  • Use when you are considering how to order items in a list (menu items, list of features, etc.)
  • Use when users remembering specific options is of importance to your design.

Our tendency to recall best the last and first items in a list is called the __________ effect.

This card is part of the Persuasive Patterns printed card deck

The Persuasive Patterns Card Deck is a collection of 60 design patterns driven by psychology, presented in a manner easily referenced and used as a brainstorming tool.

Get your deck!

Solution

How do you order list items?

Present important items at the beginning and end of a list to maximize recall and the likelihood that users will remember those items when the time comes to make a decision. Initial items are remembered more efficiently than items later in a list. Items at the end of a list are recalled more easily immediately after their presentation.

Concretely, you will want to:

  • Present important items at the beginning and at the end of a list to maximize recall – the probability that people will remember those items.
  • If you want people to choose one item over another, present it in the end of a list if the decision is to be made immediately after its presentation. We tend to favor the last candidate presented to us.
  • If the decision is to be made at a later time, present your preferred item at the beginning of the list.
  • Focus on only showing information relevant to the current task in your user interface to minimize the load you put on your users’ cognitive capacity. Provide tools to guide your user toward their goals, helping them be more efficient and more accurate in their tasks.
  • Add cues to things previously encountered in order to inititate recognition of the action and recall its meaning. Cues are most often graphical, but can also include sounds.
  • Limit the amount of recall required to retain relevant information to complete a task or simply to retrieve information. Human attention is limited and we are only capable of maintaining up to around five items in our short-term memory.

Rationale

When recalling items from a list, items at the beginning and the end are better recalled than the items in the middle.

Our ability to better recall items at the beginning of a list is called the primacy effect, whereas our ability to recall items at the end of a list is called a recency effect.

  • Primacy effect: Initial items on a list are stored in long-term memory more efficiently than items later in the list. The longer the time items are presented, the stronger the primacy effect is, as people then have more time to store the initial items in long-term memory.
  • Recency effect: The last few items are still in working memory and are readily available. The strength of the recency effect is unaffected by the rate of presentation, but is greatly affected by the passage of time and presentation of additional information. The recency effect further disappears when people think about other matters for thirty seconds after the last item in the list is presented.

Discussion

Presenting long lists of information to users, significantly strains our limited resources and restricted memory systems – especially short-term memory, where only three or four items or chunks of information can be maintained at one time. Our ability to recall previously presented items is also severely impacted by events between initial processing and later recall.


User Interface Design Patterns

Persuasive Design Patterns

Our tendency to recall best the last and first items in a list is called the __________ effect.

The primacy and recency effect (the tendency to remember words at the beginning and ends of lists) is evidence in support of the MSM.

The following has been adapted from IB Psychology: A Student’s Guide

Evidence for MSM: Serial position effect (primacy and recency effects)

The serial position effect (aka primacy and recency effect) is a cognitive phenomenon whereby people tend to remember the first (primacy) and last (recency) items in a series. This provides evidence for the MSM: people tend to remember the first items because they have longer to rehearse the information and they may have paid more attention to it, so it has a higher probability of being transferred to the LTS. They tend to remember the most recent information because it is still in their STS. Information in the middle may be lost because of the limited capacity of the STS. This can be shown in Glanzer and Cunitz’s famous study.


A common method used to investigate memory is using free recall. This is when participants are exposed to a list of words (e.g. listening to a tape recording of words read out) and they are then asked to write down in any order (free) as many words as they can remember (recall). Using this method, researchers detected a pattern: participants can remember words better when they appear at the beginning of a list and at the end of a list. This has been dubbed the serial position effect (aka the primacy and recency effects).

Glanzer and Cunitz proposed that this was because the memories were coming from two different stores – the STS and the LTS. In order to demonstrate this, they conducted a series of experiments involving memory tests.

One of these experiments used 46 enlisted army men who were shown word monosyllabic words from the Thorndike-Lorge list on a screen using a projector. The experimenter read the words as they appeared also. The researchers used a repeated measures design by testing subjects individually and randomly assigning the word lists to one of the three conditions. The three conditions were:

  1. Immediate Free Recall Condition (IFR): wrote words down immediately after hearing them
  2. Delayed Free Recall Condition (DRF) – 10 seconds: wrote words down after a delay of 10 seconds.
  3. Delayed Free Recall Condition (DRF) – 30 seconds: wrote words down after a delay of 30 seconds.

Like Peterson and Peterson’s study, participants had a distraction task during the delay and had to count backwards in 3s to prevent further rehearsal.

The results showed that when there was no delay in recall (IFR) the primacy and recency effect was demonstrated as per usual. (Re-read above to see how this supports the MSM).

However, in the DFR-30 group only the primacy effect was present and the longer the delay, the more reduced was the recency effect (see graph below). This is further support for the MSM because it shows that the rehearsal has not changed the transfer to the LTS (because the primacy effect still exists), but the recency effect has gone because there was no time for rehearsal (because of the distraction task) and the 30 second delay was longer than the short-term stores capacity so the memories decayed (were lost).

Our tendency to recall best the last and first items in a list is called the __________ effect.

You can see that as the delay increases, the recency effect disappears but the primacy effect remains. This provides further support for the MSM as it shows the duration of the STS is limited and that information rehearsed can be transferred to the LTS.

It’s interesting to note that these experiments were conducted before Atkinson and Shiffrin proposed the MSM, so these experiments may have inspired the theory, not the other way around.

References

Glanzer, Murray, and Anita R. Cunitz. “Two Storage Mechanisms in Free Recall.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5.4 (1966): 351-60. Web. (Link to full study)

The Internal Assessment

This is a common study for students to conduct for their IB Psychology Internal Assessments. However, there are numerous pitfalls that you have to be careful of. If you are thinking of conducting this study for your IA, here are some things to keep in mind.

  • Relevant Theory: The multi-store model of memory
  • Tip 1: Simplify the IV to two conditions to make the inferential statistics easier.
  • Tip 2: To conduct the inferential statistics, you will need two conditions (mean scores) to compare for one dependent variable. You should therefore focus on the primacy or the recency effect. Choose one (Note: one of them is much better than the other to choose because there are different results in each condition – see the graph above to make your decision).
  • Tip 3: You will need two average scores to compare. You will need to operationally define what the primacy or recency is in your experiment. For example, if you’re doing recency only, is this the last word in the sequence, the last two words, the last quarter, one third, etc. You could base your decision on the graph above.
  • Tip 4: If you decide against using this study for your IA, check out this blog post instead: Key Studies for the IA

Travis Dixon is an IB Psychology teacher, author, workshop leader, examiner and IA moderator.

Which Effect refers to the tendency to remember the first item on a list?

In simplest terms, the primacy effect refers to the tendency to recall information presented at the start of a list better than information at the middle or end. This is a cognitive bias that is believed to relate to the tendency to rehearse and relate memory storage systems.

Is the tendency to recall the items?

The recency effect is the tendency to remember the most recently presented information best. For example, if you are trying to memorize a list of items, the recency effect means you are more likely to recall the items from the list that you studied last.

What is primacy and recency effect with example?

Memorizing a list of words is like running a marathon. There is the beginning, a very long middle that blurs together, and now it is the end. The primacy effect is the beginning; you remember it because that is where you started. The recency effect is the finish; you remember the end the best.

What effect describes a memory effect that we encode the first and last items in a list better?

Ebbinghaus found that he could more easily remember the words that were at the beginning and end of the list compared to the words in the middle of the list. Ebbinghaus realized that the position of an item in a list did impact how well it was remembered and named this cognitive function the serial position effect.