What are the three 3 major contingency theories of leadership Please provide examples based on your reading and understanding?
What is Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership?Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership is a business framework that evaluates the effectiveness of a leader in an organization. Show
Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership states that a leader’s effectiveness is based on the situation. The framework argues that there is no one best style of leadership. The premise for this model is that an individual’s leadership style is the result of their life experiences, and therefore extremely difficult to change. Instead of trying to change one’s leadership style, the organization should match a particular leadership style to a particular situation. Who created the Contingency Model of Leadership?The creator of the Contingency Model of Leadership is Fred Fiedler, one of the leading researchers in organizational psychology of the 20th century. He helped the leadership and organizational performance field of research move from the research on traits and personal characteristics of leaders to leadership styles and behaviours. Fred Fiedler developed the Contingency Model of Leadership in 1967 as a solution to the trait and behavioural theories that were failing to produce a relevant framework for leadership dynamics. What are the two types of leadership styles according to Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership?Fiedler’s theory of leadership is based on two factors: leadership style and situational favorableness. In the context of this theory, leadership style is fixed and therefore can be measured using the Least-Preferred Co-Worker (LPC) Scale, a scale developed by Fiedler. The LPC scale is a questionnaire that helps the leader to understand their specific leadership style. The leader is asked to think of all the people with whom they have ever worked and then describe the person with whom they have worked least well, using a series of scales of 1 to 8. Leaders who score 64 and above have a relationship-oriented leadership style. These leaders derive satisfaction out of interpersonal relationships and tend to rate their least preferred coworkers in a more positive manner. Leaders who score 57 or below have a task-oriented leadership style. These leaders tend to rate their least preferred coworkers in a more negative manner and get satisfaction out of successful task performance. What are the three contingencies of Fiedler’s theory of leadership?After the leader discovers the orientation of their leadership style, let’s move on to the second factor of Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership: situational favorableness. Situational favorableness or situational control describes the leader’s ability to control the group situation. More specifically, the degree to which the leader can influence the behaviour of group members in order to face the current situation. The factors that determine the favourableness of a situation are:
Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership – Leader-Member RelationsThe Leader-Member Relations factor of Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership refers to the degree of mutual trust, respect and confidence between the leader and the subordinates. When the leader-member relations are good, the leader has a high degree of control of the situation which makes the situation more favourable for the leader. When leader-member relations in the group are poor, the leader has to shift focus away from the group task in order to regulate behaviour and conflict within the group. Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership – Task StructureThe Task Structure factor refers to the extent to which group tasks are clear and structured. When task structure is low (unstructured), group tasks are ambiguous, with no clear solution or correct approach to complete the goal. Conversely, when task structure is high (structured), the group goal is clear and straightforward and members have a clear idea about how to approach and reach the goal. Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership – Leader Position PowerThe Leader Position Power factor refers to the amount of power the leader has over the group, i.e. to which extent the leader can reward or punish the group’s members. The stronger the power, the higher the degree to which the leader can control the situation. When the position power is weak, leaders cannot control the resources so they lack the same degree of situational control as leaders high in power. ConclusionFiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership states that group effectiveness depends on an appropriate match between a leader’s style and the demands of the situation. In other words, effective leadership is contingent on matching the leader’s style to the right setting. Join the Conversation We’d love to hear what you have to say. Get in touch with us on our LinkedIn Page, Facebook Page, Twitter or TikTok. What are the three contingency theories?Three popularly studied contingency theories are: Fiedler's Contingency Model. House's Path-Goal Theory. Hersey and Blanchard's Situational Model.
What are the contingency theories of leadership?The contingency theory of leadership states that effective leadership is contingent upon the situation at hand. Essentially, it depends on whether an individual's leadership style befits the situation. According to this theory, someone can be an effective leader in one circumstance and an ineffective leader in another.
What is contingency theory of leadership example?The contingency theory of leadership supposes that a leader's effectiveness is contingent on whether or not their leadership style suits a particular situation. According to this theory, an individual can be an effective leader in one circumstance and an ineffective leader in another one.
What are some examples of contingency theory?Contingency Theory of Leadership: Examples
If the leader rates the person they would least like to work with favorably, they are considered a relationship-oriented leader. Their strengths would include managing conflict well and developing strong workplace relationships.
|
