Example of top-dowm mechanism to control primary production năm 2024

Anderson, C. & Lee, S. Y. Defoliation of the mangrove Avicennia marina in Hong Kong: Cause and consequence. Biotropica 27, 218-226 (1995).

Carpenter, S. R., Kitchell, J. F. & Hodgson, J. R. Cascading trophic interactions and lake productivity. BioScience 35, 634-639 (1985).

Dayton, P. K. "Toward an understanding of community resilience and the potential effect of enrichments to the benthos at McMurdo Sound." Proceedings of the Colloquium on Conservation Problems in Antarctica, ed. B. C. Parker. Allen Press, 1972.

Estes, J. A. & Duggins, D. O. Sea otters and kelp forests in Alaska: Generality and variation in a community ecological paradigm. Ecological Monographs 65, 75-100 (1995).

Estes, J. A. & Palmisano, J. F. Sea otters: Their role in structuring nearshore communities. Science 185, 1058-1060 (1974).

Estes, J. A. & Peterson, C. H. Marine ecological research in seashore and seafloor systems: Accomplishments and future directions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 195, 281-289 (2000).

Feller, I. C. The role of herbivory by wood-boring insects in mangrove ecosystems in Belize. Oikos 97, 167-176 (2002).

Fortin, D. et al. Wolves influence elk movements: Behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 86, 1320-1330 (2005).

Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E. & Slobodkin, L. B. Community structure, population control, and competition. The American Naturalist 94, 421-425 (1960).

Hard, J. S., Werner, R. A. & Holsten, E. H. Susceptibility of White Spruce to attack by Spruce beetles during the early years of outbreak in Alaska. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 13, 678-683 (1983).

Holdredge, C., Bertness, M. D. & Altieri, A. H. Role of crab herbivory in die-off of New England salt marshes. Conservation Biology 23, 672-679 (2009).

Jackson, J. B. C. Reefs since Columbus. Coral Reefs 16, S23-S32 (1997).

Jefferies, R. L. "Long-term damage to sub-artic coastal ecosystems by geese: Ecological indicators and measures of ecosystem dysfunction," Disturbance and Recovery in Artic Lands: An Ecological Perspective, NATO, ASI Series Volume 25, 151-165, ed. R. M. M. Crawford. Kluwer Academic Press, 1997.

Kauffman, M. J., Brodie, J. F. & Jules, E. S. Are wolves saving Yellowstone's aspen? A landscape-level test of a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade. Ecology 91, 2742-2755 (2010).

Owen, H. J. & Norton, D. A. The diet of introduced brushtail possums Trichosurus vulpecula in a low diversity New Zealand Nothofagus forest and possible implications for conservation management. Biological Conservation 71, 339-345 (1995).

Pace, M. L. et al. Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14, 483-488 (1999).

Power, M. E. Habitat heterogeneity and the functional significance of fish in river food webs. Ecology 73, 1675-1688 (1992).

Ripple, W. J. & Larson, E. J. Historic aspen recruitment, elk, and wolves in northern Yellowstone National Park, USA. Biological Conservation 95, 361-370 (2000).

Rose, C. D. et al. Overgrazing of a large seagrass bed by the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus in Outer Florida Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 190, 211-222 (1999).

Silliman, B. R. & Bertness, M. D. A trophic cascade regulates salt marsh primary production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99, 10500-10505 (2002).

Silliman, B. R. et al. Drought, snails, and large-scale die-off of southern US salt marshes. Science 310, 1803-1806 (2005).

Strong, D. R. Are trophic cascades all wet-differentiation and donor-control in speciose ecosystems. Ecology 73, 747-754 (1992).

Terborgh, J. et al. Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments. Science 294, 1923-1926 (2001).

Wootton, J. T. Indirect effects, prey susceptibility, and habitat selection: Impacts of birds on limpets and algae. Ecology 73, 981-991 (1992).

A few weeks ago we discussed food webs and introduced the topic of top-down and bottom-up control. Today we are going to dig a little deeper into those processes and look at some examples in the marine environment.

Biological communities are influenced by all of their parts, which include the animals, plants, bacteria and fungi that live in them. These interacting species are placed into ecological trophic levels depending on their feeding relationships. A species at the top of the food chain would be considered a consumer and a species at the bottom would be considered a producer. Changes to one of the levels in the food chain can result in changes in other levels which scientists call a trophic cascade. These cascades can affect levels below that altered level or levels above the altered level. We categorize these directional cascades as top-down or bottom-up control, which simply means the changes to the food chain occurred at either the top trophic level or the bottom trophic level and then impacted the other levels up or down the food chain.

A top-down controlled system focuses on how top consumers influence lower trophic levels. This could be thought of as a predator driven system. One of the classic examples of a top-down trophic cascade is the sea otter story from the Pacific coast. Key players in the food chain are sea otters, sea urchins and kelp. Decreases in the sea otter population, whether due to human hunting (historically) or climate change (recently), led to increases in the urchin population. As urchins graze on kelp, more sea urchins resulted in less kelp cover. These changes can have indirect effects too. In the sea otter example, loss of kelp forests affected the fish populations that used the kelp as a habitat.

Food webs in kelp forests with and without sea otters showing the impacts of a trophic cascade. Source: Brumbaugh AMNH-CBC, http://research.amnh.org/biodiversity/crisis/index.html

In contrast, a bottom-up system focuses on the lower trophic levels and the factors that drive interactions at the base of the food chain. This could be thought of as a resource driven (resources being food or habitat availability) system. An example of bottom-up control would be nutrient driven changes to seagrass ecosystems. In the northern Gulf of Mexico increases in nutrient levels to seagrass meadows from land runoff can cause increased growth of the epiphytes that grow on seagrass blades. This increased abundance of epiphytes changes the population sizes of herbivores that graze on this algae (mesograzers) and this increase results in increases in their predators.

Overgrowth of epiphytes on seagrass blades resulting from nutrient input. Photo credit: Jonathan Lefcheck. http://www.vims.edu/research/topics/sav/ts_list/duffy_nsf_biodiversity.php

But does this mean that a system may only exhibit one type of control? Yes, no and sometimes. The answer is not straightforward, as control mechanisms seem to change with the type of ecosystem, over time and sometimes on conditions prior to a change. Coastal wetlands are a good example of this. Traditionally salt marshes were thought to be exclusively controlled by bottom-up processes; food webs were dependent on the amount of marsh grass and algal primary production and a correlation could be drawn between the amount of nutrients flowing into the system and its productivity. However, more recent research on consumer populations in salt marshes has shown that geese and snail herbivory can cause extensive loss of the habitat and trigger a top-down trophic cascade. ACER scientists Drs. Valentine and Heck have spent much of their research career looking at the relative importance of these controls in seagrass ecosystems.

ACER researchers are looking at how the Deepwater Horizon oil spill (DWH) affected the diversity and resilience of coastal ecosystems. How the oil affected inshore and offshore food chains is one aspect of this research. Did the oil cause any trophic cascades? Did the cessation in commercial fishing in the northern Gulf after the spill and the potential increased abundance of top level consumers drive the observed changes in other fish populations? Did the emigration of some large consumers such as sharks from the area result in increases in their prey populations? Did oil coating salt marshes grasses result in decreased marsh primary production that affected the abundance of herbivores? Given the nursery function of salt marshes, did oil settling onto mudflats result in decreased abundance of infaunal species and therefore fewer shrimp, fish and crabs making it to adulthood? The answers to these questions will help us to understand the impact of the DWH and other disturbances on coastal food webs.

What is an example of top

Trophic cascades: In top-down regulation, different trophic levels are limited by the next level up. For example, in a simple system of three trophic levels—plants, herbivores, and carnivores—plants are limited by herbivores, which are limited by predators.

What is an example of top

Perhaps the most representative example of a top-down approach in biology is the theory of evolution by natural selection [25].

What is an example of a top

One of the classic examples of a top-down trophic cascade is the sea otter story from the Pacific coast. Key players in the food chain are sea otters, sea urchins and kelp.

What is an example of a top

One example of top-down processing is the Stoop effect, which shows how interference affects reaction time. For example, on a list of different colors where the word and the text color do not match, the brain can take longer to process and identify text color or read the word because of the conflicting information.