So sánh sony 35fe và 35 art năm 2024
|
The prime lens allowing the most versatility represents a very subjective decision. On my recent trip to Rome used my Fuji X-T3 with 50mm (75mm full-frame) to travel light. My A7RIII with 35mm f2 Voigtlander (1100 euros) probably more useful in the Tivoli Gardens or Ravello. But prefer not squashing my camera equipment in the hustle and bustle of airports and aeroplanes. Upshot: Medium telephoto lens more useful than expected; made for travel purposes? Sony FE 35mm f1,4 GM cost 1700 euros; above my pay-grade. Dec 30, 2021 at 11:06 AM wind30 Offline • • Upload & Sell: Off Before every vacation, I think about swapping my sigma 35mm f1.2 for the lighter gm lens. Problem is my sigma 35mm f1.2 has no problem whatsoever except weight� I get older every year though.. Oct 08, 2022 at 04:22 AM Daran Offline • • • Upload & Sell: Off j4nu wrote: This makes those wide-open shots have more of a dramatic (3d?) effect on the Bigma, but on the other hand it's more difficult to have multiple people in focus... And here I was thinking you could stop the lens down. Oct 08, 2022 at 04:35 AM j4nu Online • • • • Upload & Sell: Off As much as using a slower zoom in general, but then you would be missing the point of having the Bigma... Oct 08, 2022 at 04:56 AM Goodrich Offline • • Upload & Sell: Off Size matters, if you have to carry your gear. There is a reason that Leica lenses are expensive. If not, the Sigma f1.2 lenses are cheaper and more capable. That said, the recent Sony lenses have become smaller/lighter while offering better performance / wider apertures than their predecessors. A reason that I have come back to Sony. The application of Sony's latest technology to the full range of its lenses will, of course, take some time. Bring on the new 85mm f1.2/4. Oct 08, 2022 at 03:23 PM wind30 Offline • • Upload & Sell: Off Goodrich wrote: Size matters, if you have to carry your gear. There is a reason that Leica lenses are expensive. If not, the Sigma f1.2 lenses are cheaper and more capable. That said, the recent Sony lenses have become smaller/lighter while offering better performance / wider apertures than their predecessors. A reason that I have come back to Sony. The application of Sony's latest technology to the full range of its lenses will, of course, take some time. Bring on the new 85mm f1.2/4. I just got the 50mm f1.4 Gm and I am pretty impressed with it. Bokeh is pretty soft and very low fringing, better than most reviews reported. I wonder how lucky I will be with the 35mm Gm . Maybe I should finally bite the bullet and get the 35mm gm� The only thing that stop me is the forest far comparison in the following review. The gm bokeh just looked bad there. I now have 14mm 24mm 50mm f1.4 gm and sigma 35mm 85mm. Bet Sony will release a new 85mm gm soon. May 26, 2023 at 09:12 PM fotografur Offline • • • • • Upload & Sell: Off 1bwana1 wrote: The 35mm f/1.4 GM is my favorite and most used prime lens. It is an amazingly good lens in all respects. Same. May 27, 2023 at 03:54 AM frezeiss82 Offline • Upload & Sell: Off I absolutely love 35 mm. I have tried the Zeiss M 35, Zeiss M 35 Biogon, Leica 35 summicron & summarit, Sony Zeiss 35, Sigma 35 1.2 and 35 GM. This is how I ranked them: 1. Sony Zeiss 35 1.4 2. Zeiss 35 C-Biogon / 35 Biogon 3. 35 GM, Sigma 35 1.2 The Sony Zeiss 35 will not be everyone's cup of tea though, it got a bit of defect (character) combined with the mild color saturation & lovely drawing style which I adore. Both newer Sigma 35 1.2 and 35 GM are perfect lenses, I dont agree with the saying that Sigma is more exotic, its just more less the same a tiny bit less doff but you do have to sacrifice a lot in terms of weight. I'd rather take the 20 G and 35 GM with a 6L sling bag rather than the same bag only with the Sigma lens. Its a a different story if the 35 1.2 lens is a Zeiss lens with the same weight. It usually will have higher micro / macro contrast coupled with fast doff transition. That would be enough attribute to justify the weight. May 27, 2023 at 04:20 AM j4nu Online • • • • Upload & Sell: Off I think it has been said many times now, but if you're used to the Bigma you will notice the difference in bokeh / transition after switching to 35GM. I posted a comparison a long time ago, Bigma's bokeh balls are essentially less pronounced (edgy, contrasty) in most cases. As for 50 GMs, I think if you mostly care about rendering, 50/1.2 is a slightly better choice than 50/1.4 ... May 27, 2023 at 05:07 AM wind30 Offline • • Upload & Sell: Off j4nu wrote: I think it has been said many times now, but if you're used to the Bigma you will notice the difference in bokeh / transition after switching to 35GM. I posted a comparison a long time ago, Bigma's bokeh balls are essentially less pronounced (edgy, contrasty) in most cases. As for 50 GMs, I think if you mostly care about rendering, 50/1.2 is a slightly better choice than 50/1.4 ... Do u have lots of experience with both the 35mm f1.4 gm and 50mm f1.4 gm? For transitional bokeh rendering which lens is better? I think I can tolerate 50mm f1.4 gm bokeh. I don�t really like the 135mm f1.8 gm bokeh. May 27, 2023 at 05:39 AM j4nu Online • • • • Upload & Sell: Off wind30 wrote: Do u have lots of experience with both the 35mm f1.4 gm and 50mm f1.4 gm? For transitional bokeh rendering which lens is better? I think I can tolerate 50mm f1.4 gm bokeh. I don�t really like the 135mm f1.8 gm bokeh. I don't have any experience with 50/1.4GM, I just went through a lot of reviews when it came out because I was interested in how it compares to 1.2 . From what I've seen, it's closer to 1.2 when it comes to rendering, as opposed to 35GM vs 35/1.2DN, where I think the difference is quite visible under difficult conditions. This is a crop from my old comparison: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52929739558_dedf7eba31_o.jpg It might not show much to some, but those more distinct bokeh ball edges translate to less smooth transition zone and bokeh in general. Of course, if you blur everything out by focusing close / having the background far away, the difference will not be visible, but when taking full body portraits in a forest it will be there... The longer the focal length, the easier it is to achieve enough background blur to make those differences disappear. So, I don't really have such issues with 135GM... May 27, 2023 at 05:58 AM wind30 Offline • • Upload & Sell: Off j4nu wrote: I don't have any experience with 50/1.4GM, I just went through a lot of reviews when it came out because I was interested in how it compares to 1.2 . From what I've seen, it's closer to 1.2 when it comes to rendering, as opposed to 35GM vs 35/1.2DN, where I think the difference is quite visible under difficult conditions. This is a crop from my old comparison: https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/52929739558_dedf7eba31_o.jpg It might not show much to some, but those more distinct bokeh ball edges translate to less smooth transition zone and bokeh in general. Of course, if you blur everything out by focusing close...Show more → 135mm has much less transitional bokeh as usually the background are pretty blown out but there are always stuff in the transition areas. 35mm full body shots usually have large areas in the transition zone. Kind of curious other than 35mm f1.2 and 50mm f1.2, is there any other lens u like for rendering? May 27, 2023 at 06:20 AM j4nu Online • • • • Upload & Sell: Off wind30 wrote: 135mm has much less transitional bokeh as usually the background are pretty blown out but there are always stuff in the transition areas. 35mm full body shots usually have large areas in the transition zone. Kind of curious other than 35mm f1.2 and 50mm f1.2, is there any other lens u like for rendering? Yes, exactly what I had in mind concerning 135mm. I mostly shoot my kids so even full body portraits allow me to get a bit closer than to adults, which helps with blur. I also shoot 35mm a lot more than 135mm, so I run into distracting backgrounds more often with it. As for other lenses, I think you've already listed others I like: 24GM and 85DN. I also tried Argus 35/0.95 but in my opinion it requires specific conditions to best the Bigma when it comes to rendering (though bokeh balls are bigger at 0.95 May 27, 2023 at 08:45 AM steamtrain Offline • • Upload & Sell: Off If you don't care about size but you do care about price, and the 50GM is thrown in the comparison anyway maybe the Sigma 40mm f/1.4 Art could be part of the comparison as well. The Sigma FE 35mm f/1.2 DN is 1500 euro new. The Sigma both FE and EF 40mm f/1.4 Art is 750 euro new. That's half the price of the FE f/1.2. When I compare the 40mm Art on my R5 to the 50mm f/1.2 GM on the A7IV the GM wins for preferred focal length and smoother backgrounds, however, the 40mm Art (I'm trying to be as SUBjective as I can) wins for bold contrast, nice colours (although the R5 might deserve some credit as well here), and an overall (non bokeh hurting!) "punch" the GM "doesn't match", although the character of the GM has it's own strengths as well, depending on the use case. Generally I'm using the GM for travel and the Art at home for both weight and field of view reasons, but it still happens I'm bringing the 40mm despite it's weight. I don't know about the 35mm lenses being discussed here, but the price advantage of the 40mm speaks for itself. May 27, 2023 at 10:59 AM 1 2 FM Forums | Sony Forum | Join Upload & Sell 1 2 |
