Korea democratic peoples republic of là nước nào năm 2024

Korea democratic peoples republic of là nước nào năm 2024

[Tin tức] Này bạn! Người học ngoại ngữ!

Bạn có biết cách cải thiện kỹ năng ngôn ngữ của mình không❓ Tất cả những gì bạn cần làm là nhờ người bản ngữ sửa bài viết của mình! Với HiNative, bạn có thể nhờ người bản ngữ sửa bài viết của mình miễn phí ✍️✨.

Đăng ký

Crimes against humanity continue to be committed by state authorities against North Korean civilians.

BACKGROUND:

The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), or North Korea, is one of the most authoritarian and repressive countries in the world, severely restricting the universal human rights of its people in a widespread manner. In a landmark report issued in February 2014, the UN Human Rights Council (HRC)-mandated Commission of Inquiry (CoI) on the DPRK established responsibility at the highest level of government for ongoing crimes against humanity, as well as other systematic and widespread human rights violations committed by the government against its people.

The CoI’s report detailed harrowing abuses committed by the DPRK government, including extermination, murder, enslavement, torture, imprisonment, rape, forced abortions and other forms of sexual violence, persecution on political, religious, racial and gender grounds, the forcible transfer of populations, the enforced disappearance of persons and the inhumane act of knowingly causing prolonged starvation. The CoI reported that persons accused of political crimes have been subject to execution without trial and that the DPRK government has abducted and disappeared non-nationals. As of January 2023, the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) found that serious human rights violations and possible international crimes, including abductions and enforced disappearances, overseas forced labor and sexual and gender-based violence, continue to occur. Several reports by the UN Secretary-General have also documented pervasive torture and forced labor among the country’s large detainee population, which includes labor camps, prisons and other detention centers. The government targets perceived political opponents, often sending them to political prison camps.

For decades the DPRK government has attempted to insulate itself from international engagement and scrutiny. To date the DPRK government has refused to cooperate with international human rights mechanisms and offices, including the OHCHR office in Seoul – which was established in 2015 – and the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the DPRK. Moreover, under the pretext of preventing the spread of COVID-19, in 2020 the DPRK government further entrenched its policy of isolation by closing international borders and enforcing repressive and unnecessary restrictions on basic freedoms. These prolonged measures have severely restricted access to food, medicines, healthcare and livelihoods. According to the World Food Programme, nearly 12 million people are undernourished.

Prior to 2014, the UN Security Council (UNSC) engaged with the DPRK almost exclusively in the context of nuclear non-proliferation and had never directly addressed ongoing human rights abuses. In response to the CoI’s findings, in December 2014 the human rights situation in the DPRK was added as a separate UNSC agenda item. Meetings were held annually from 2014-2017. On 17 August 2023 the UNSC convened its first open briefing on the human rights situation in the DPRK since 2017, which was preceded by a closed Arria-Formula meeting on the human rights situation in the country on 17 March 2023.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS:

On 26 August the DPRK announced the partial reopening of its borders. Reports surfaced In October that Chinese authorities forcibly returned more than 500 people to North Korea. On 17 October a group of UN experts released a statement calling on China to respect the principle of non-refoulement. On 15 November the UN General Assembly’s Third Committee passed a resolution on the situation of human rights in the DPRK, which, among other demands, called for respect for non-refoulement.

The UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the DPRK, Elizabeth Salmón, released a report on 12 October, which highlighted continued gross violations of human rights, particularly the rights of women and children, and stressed that the DPRK’s extreme militarization has come at the expense of human rights and fundamental freedoms while further entrenching isolation.

Satellite imagery collected in October revealed that Russia has purportedly begun shipping munitions from the DPRK, in direct violation of several UNSC resolutions that prohibit DPRK from exporting or importing arms.

ANALYSIS:

Despite international engagements focused on denuclearization and other security issues, the human rights and humanitarian situation in the DPRK has largely been neglected. The repression of civil society and independent media, as well as the absence of free elections or political space for open debate, is intended to perpetually silence criticism of the authorities and diminish opportunities for the review and reform of North Korea’s human rights practices.

The country’s human rights record is intimately linked to its weapons development program, which benefits from forced labor, contributes to widespread poverty and hunger through unequal resource distribution and enhances the government’s capacity to repress dissent, without fear of international response or intervention. The alleged increase in weapons distribution between the DPRK and Russia heightens the risk of the commission of atrocity crimes in North Korea and in conflict zones around the world, including in Ukraine.

As international borders with the DPRK have reopened, forced repatriation of refugees and asylum seekers by neighboring states has left these populations at grave risk of internment, torture, sexual and gender-based violence, enforced disappearance or execution. Despite being party to conventions that prohibit refoulement, China considers border-crossers to be illegal “economic migrants” and does not allow them to seek asylum or resettlement and deports them under a 1986 bilateral treaty with the DPRK.

RISK ASSESSMENT:

  • * The absence of any checks on the power of the DPRK leadership.
    • Impunity for past and ongoing atrocity crimes enjoyed by the DPRK government.
    • Record of serious violations of international human rights and customary international law.
    • Economic instability, poverty and famine, all of which are exacerbated by government policies.
    • Significant capacity to commit atrocities, especially against vulnerable populations, including detainees, women, persons with disabilities and children.

NECESSARY ACTION:

Amid the border reopening, the DPRK authorities must allow for the return of international humanitarian organizations and guarantee rapid and unhindered access to vulnerable populations. Neighboring states have a responsibility under international law to provide safe passage out of the DPRK for civilians at risk of human rights violations and must strictly adhere to the principle of non-refoulement.

The international community’s legitimate pursuit of denuclearization on the Korean Peninsula should not overshadow the need to uphold the universal human rights of all Koreans. Any negotiations on rapprochement with the DPRK should aim to address ongoing human rights abuses, some of which may amount to crimes against humanity. The DPRK government should fully cooperate with OHCHR and allow entry to Special Rapporteur Salmón.

It is imperative that all UN bodies continue to focus attention on the threat the DPRK government poses to the universal human rights of its own population. The UNSC must remain seized of the human rights situation in the DPRK and hold regular open briefings on the issue. Council members should act on the recommendations made by the CoI and other relevant human rights mechanisms and offices, including by referring the situation to the International Criminal Court and imposing targeted sanctions against those responsible for or complicit in crimes against humanity, regardless of the position of the alleged perpetrator. UN member states should explore creative ways to maintain maximum international scrutiny and explore potential avenues for both judicial and non-judicial accountability mechanisms.

Access constraints have prohibited a complete assessment of the current human rights situation in the DPRK.