Gardners theory of multiple intelligences divides intelligence into
Even though it’s an age-old concept, there’s still significant disagreement when it comes to defining intelligence. Show Are high-achievers in the classroom more intelligent than high-achievers on the sports field? How about people who are hugely successful at business, but flunked all of their exams. Neisser et al. (1996) define intelligence as someone’s ability to: From this definition we can already start to see a wide range of potential measures and expressions of intelligence. LATEST POSTS
Watch more psychology unlocked videos here Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again. Your subscription has been successful. Psychology eZine Subscribe to our weekly newsletter for videos, articles, news and more. Enter your email address to subscribe Provide your email address to subscribe. For e.g [email protected]SUBSCRIBE
We use Sendinblue as our marketing platform. By Clicking below to submit this form, you acknowledge that the information you provided will be transferred to Sendinblue for processing in accordance with their terms of use Spearman’s Two-Factor TheorySpearman (1927) splits intelligence into two factors:
If Spearman’s theoretical structure of intellgence is correct, the G Factor interacts with the S Factor in producing an outcome of any given task. Therefore someone might vary slightly in ability on specific tasks, but their overall achievements on different tasks should be roughly similar. This has been moderately supported in research. Individuals who perform well in a spelling test are are likely to perform better than average on a different test, such as mental maths. But research (Ozer, 1985) finds that the correlations between scores of specific tests are moderate, at between 0.3 and 0.7. Spearman argues that this suppports his concept of the G and S Factors interacting. Sternberg’s Triarchic Theory of IntelligenceSternberg (1985) suggests there are three aspects of intelligence:
Sternberg’s model is much more life-centric than Spearman’s Two-Factor Model, which focuses more on measurement by tests such as IQ tests. Importantly, Sternberg’s concept of Contextual Intelligence helps move us away from intelligence being bound to academic-style tests. If the society you live in requires strategic hunting skills, but doesn’t require reading skills, are you any less intelligent for not being able to read? Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences TheoryGardner (1983) develops a theory of intelligences – in the plural – in a similar vein to Sternberg. However, rather than general divisions – as presented by Sternberg – Gardner divides his forms of intelligence by key strength. Gardner proposes seven categories of intelligence:
Gardner recognises that intelligence isn’t an on-off switch, and whilst different styles will have different strengths and limitations, no single form of intelligence holds a monopoly on the concept. What are the three types of intelligence in Gardner's theory?Many of us are familiar with three broad categories in which people learn: visual learning, auditory learning, and kinesthetic learning. Beyond these three categories, many theories of and approaches toward human learning potential have been established.
What is Gardner's theory of learning?Howard Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligence
According to Gardner, this theory, which emerged from cognitive research, “documents the extent to which students possess different kinds of minds and therefore learn, remember, perform, and understand in different ways.”
|