Among all training outcomes, cognitive outcomes are most frequently assessed.
|
The goal is where we want to be. The objectives are the steps needed to get there. As seen in this flow chart, the outcome and the learning objectives connect you with (and among) your students, the course content, assignments, and your teaching approach. Show
 DescriptionExampleCourse Goal / Learning Outcomedescribes broad aspects of behavior which incorporate a wide range of knowledge and skillUpon completion of this course the student will have reliably demonstrated the ability to use the conventions of grammar when creating paragraphs.Learning Objectivestend to describe specific, discrete units of knowledge and skill can be accomplished within a short timeframeGiven a paragraph of ten sentences, the student will be able to identify ten rules of grammar that are used in its construction. Example Learning ObjectivesUpon completion of the unit on plant growth and development students will be able to:
It is easy to measure each of the objectives.Either the student has or has not accomplished each one. These measurable objectives can then be used as the basis for your grading or another type of student assessment. For example, based on the first learning objective above, if a student is able to list all 5 plant hormones they earn 100% for the assignment if they can only list 4 plant hormones they earn 90%, and so on. Bloom’s Taxonomy as a Framework for Writing Learning ObjectivesDeveloping a basic understanding of Bloom’s Taxonomy (Bloom et al., 1956) is a good place to start as you begin writing learning objectives. Bloom’s Taxonomy in a nutshell: In the late 1940s a group of educators began classifying educational goals and objectives. The intent was to develop a classification system for three domains: the cognitive (mental skills or knowledge), the affective (feelings and emotional skills or attitude), and the psychomotor (manual or physical skills). The work that resulted in the cognitive domain was completed in 1956 and is commonly referred to as Bloom’s Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain (Bloom et al., 1956). The major concept of the taxonomy is that educational objectives can be arranged in a hierarchy that moves from less to more complex levels of knowledge. The levels are successive; one level must be mastered before the next level can be reached. The original levels published by Bloom et al. (1956) were ordered as follows: Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. In 2001 Anderson and Krathwohl published a revised version of Bloom’s Taxonomy that reflected what has been learned in the forty or so years since it was first published. In summary, the changes reflect more outcome-focused modern education objectives and include switching the names of the levels from nouns to active verbs. The two highest levels have also been changed with the pinnacle level now being ‘create’. The revised levels are: Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate and Create. View CELT’s Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy page. Applying Bloom’s Taxonomy to Learning ObjectivesEffective learning objectives need to be observable and/or measurable, and using action verbs is a way to achieve this. Verbs such as “identify”, “argue,” or “construct” are more measurable than vague or passive verbs such as “understand” or “be aware of”. As you design your course focus on creating clear learning objectives and then use these objectives to guide class assignments, exams, and overall course assessment questions. Action VerbsBelow are examples of action verbs associated with each level of the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. These are useful in writing learning objectives, assignment objectives, and exam questions. RememberChoose UnderstandClassify ApplyChoose AnalyzeCategorize EvaluateAppraise CreateCombine ResourcesView the interactive model of learning objectives which shows the relationship between the knowledge dimension and the cognitive process dimension. Download and review Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy on this website Content on sample learning objectives adapted from: Center for Teaching, Learning and Technology, Washington State University (2013). ReferencesAnderson, L.W., & Krathwohl (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman. Bloom, B., Englehart, M. Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans, Green. Which training outcome is most often measured?Among all training outcomes, cognitive outcomes are most frequently assessed.
What is used to assess cognitive outcomes?Conventional approaches to evaluating cognitive outcomes of training typically use paper-and-pencil tests that emphasize gains or differences in declarative knowledge. Yet a key factor in differentiating expert and novice performance is the way individuals organize their knowledge.
Which design is the most accurate and reliable to evaluate training effectiveness?The Kirkpatrick Taxonomy Model
Kirkpatrick Taxonomy is one of the most widely used methods for evaluating the effectiveness of corporate training programs. Developed and designed by Don Kirkpatrick, the framework offers a comprehensive four-level strategy to evaluate the effectiveness of any training course or program.
Which process of collecting the outcomes needs to determine whether training is effective?Training evaluation is the systematic process of collecting information and using that information to improve your training. Evaluation provides feedback to help you identify if your training achieved your intended outcomes, and helps you make decisions about future trainings.
|
