GTX 670 có thể là mid-range của bộ card đồ họa Kepler mới nhất, nhưng giá của chúng khiến chúng nằm ngoài tầm với của hầu hết entry-level game thủ PC entry-level. Mặt khác, GTX 660 gần hơn với giá cả phải chăng hợp lý với mức giá là ₫ 5349655.3. Tin tốt là, với việc phát hành GTX 660 Ti, giá của GTX 660 đang được giảm giá nhiều hơn.
NVIDIA thẻ xx60 của xx60 luôn được xác định bởi giá entry-level với hiệu suất gõ cửa các thẻ đồ họa mid-range - đặc biệt là khi được ép xung. Sau khi dành thời gian để kiểm tra đầy đủ card đồ họa Kepler bên trong GTX 660, chúng ta có thể nói mà không nghi ngờ gì rằng nó tiếp tục xu hướng. Thông số kỹ thuật, GTX 660 vượt qua người tiền nhiệm trực tiếp của nó, GTX 560, bằng cách khoe khoang 24.2 % fps nhiều hơn.
GTX 660 có 2 GB RAM so với bộ nhớ video GTX 560 ' 1 GB. May mắn thay, hiệu suất chơi game khá ấn tượng. GTX 660 luôn cung cấp tốc độ khung hình tuyệt vời tăng so với GTX 560, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti và nó thực sự chứng minh sự nâng cấp.
GTX 670 có thể là mid-range của bộ card đồ họa Kepler mới nhất, nhưng giá của chúng khiến chúng nằm ngoài tầm với của hầu hết entry-level game thủ PC entry-level. Mặt khác, GTX 660 gần hơn với giá cả phải chăng hợp lý với mức giá là ₫ 5349655.3. Tin tốt là, với việc phát hành GTX 660 Ti, giá của GTX 660 đang được giảm giá nhiều hơn.
NVIDIA thẻ xx60 của xx60 luôn được xác định bởi giá entry-level với hiệu suất gõ cửa các thẻ đồ họa mid-range - đặc biệt là khi được ép xung. Sau khi dành thời gian để kiểm tra đầy đủ card đồ họa Kepler bên trong GTX 660, chúng ta có thể nói mà không nghi ngờ gì rằng nó tiếp tục xu hướng. Thông số kỹ thuật, GTX 660 vượt qua người tiền nhiệm trực tiếp của nó, GTX 560, bằng cách khoe khoang 24.2 % fps nhiều hơn.
GTX 660 có 2 GB RAM so với bộ nhớ video GTX 560 ' 1 GB. May mắn thay, hiệu suất chơi game khá ấn tượng. GTX 660 luôn cung cấp tốc độ khung hình tuyệt vời tăng so với GTX 560, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti và nó thực sự chứng minh sự nâng cấp.
NVIDIA thẻ xx30 của xx30 luôn được xác định bởi giá budget với hiệu suất gõ cửa các thẻ đồ họa entry-level - đặc biệt là khi được ép xung. Sau khi dành thời gian để kiểm tra đầy đủ card đồ họa Pascal bên trong GT 1030, chúng ta có thể nói mà không nghi ngờ gì rằng nó tiếp tục xu hướng.
The GeForce 930M features a core clock frequency of 928 MHz and a DDR3 memory speed of 900 MHz. It also makes use of a 64-bit memory bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is made up of 384 SPUs, 24 Texture Address Units, and 8 ROPs.
Compare that to the GeForce GTX 660, which features GPU core speed of 980 MHz, and 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory running at 1502 MHz through a 192-bit bus. It also is comprised of 960 Stream Processors, 80 TAUs, and 24 ROPs.
Benchmarks
These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Memory Bandwidth
In theory, the GeForce GTX 660 should be 901% faster than the GeForce 930M in general, because of its higher bandwidth. []
Texel Rate
The GeForce GTX 660 should be much [about 252%] better at texture filtering than the GeForce 930M. []
Pixel Rate
The GeForce GTX 660 is much [about 217%] faster with regards to full screen anti-aliasing than the GeForce 930M, and also will be capable of handling higher resolutions while still performing well. []
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may [and probably will] vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores1344384CUDA cores1344no dataCore clock speed915 MHz928 MHzBoost clock speed980 MHz941 MHzNumber of transistors3,540 millionno dataManufacturing process technology28 nm28 nmPower consumption [TDP]150 Watt33 WattTexture fill rate102.5 billion/sec22.58Floating-point performance2,459.5 gflops722.7 gflops
Size and compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce 930M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus [motherboard compatibility], additional power connectors [power supply compatibility]. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0PCI Express 3.0InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8Length9.5" [24.1 cm]no dataHeight4.376" [11.1 cm]no dataWidth2-slotno dataSupplementary power connectorsTwo 6-pinNoneSLI options+no data
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory typeGDDR5DDR3Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GBMemory bus width192-bit GDDR564 BitMemory clock speed6.0 GB/s1800 MHzMemory bandwidth144.2 GB/s14.4 GB/sShared memory--
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones [so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips]. OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputsMulti monitor support4 displaysno dataHDMI+no dataHDCP+no dataMaximum VGA resolution2048x1536no dataAudio input for HDMIInternalno data
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Blu-Ray+no data3D Gaming+no data3D Vision+no dataGPU Boostno data2.0Optimusno data+GameWorksno data+
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX12 [11_0]12 [11_0]Shader Model5.15.1OpenGL4.34.5OpenCL1.21.2Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126CUDA++
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GTX 660 Ti outperforms 930M by 334% in our combined benchmark results.
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 [the last being done in 4K resolution if possible], and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
GTX 660 Ti outperforms 930M by 334% in Passmark.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
GTX 660 Ti outperforms 930M by 226% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
GTX 660 Ti outperforms 930M by 291% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GTX 660 Ti outperforms 930M by 272% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
GTX 660 Ti outperforms 930M by 354% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
GTX 660 Ti outperforms 930M by 187% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
GTX 660 Ti outperforms 930M by 227% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.
GeekBench 5 CUDA
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
GTX 660 Ti outperforms 930M by 120% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 660 Ti and GeForce 930M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC [SHA256] 99 Mh/s 84 Mh/s
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Performance in popular games
Full HD Low Preset
Cyberpunk 207718−20 5−6
Full HD Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Battlefield 535−40
+680%
5−6
−680%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Cyberpunk 207718−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Far Cry 527−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Far Cry New Dawn30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Forza Horizon 440−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Hitman 330−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Horizon Zero Dawn21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Red Dead Redemption 218−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion21−24 0−1
Full HD High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Battlefield 535−40
+680%
5−6
−680%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Cyberpunk 207718−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Far Cry 527−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Far Cry New Dawn30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Forza Horizon 440−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
Hitman 330−33
+650%
4−5
−650%
Horizon Zero Dawn21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Metro Exodus16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Red Dead Redemption 218−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt21−24
+156%
9
−156%
Watch Dogs: Legion21−24 0−1
Full HD Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey24−27
+700%
3−4
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Battlefield 535−40
+680%
5−6
−680%
Cyberpunk 207718−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Far Cry 527−30
+867%
3−4
−867%
Far Cry New Dawn30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%
Forza Horizon 440−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt21−24
+229%
7
−229%
Watch Dogs: Legion21−24 0−1
1440p High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Hitman 318−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Horizon Zero Dawn16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Metro Exodus10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Red Dead Redemption 28−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
1440p Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Battlefield 521−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Cyberpunk 20776−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 518−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Far Cry New Dawn20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Forza Horizon 421−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Watch Dogs: Legion6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
4K High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Hitman 310−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Horizon Zero Dawn9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Metro Exodus5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 26−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider6−7 0−1 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
4K Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Battlefield 510−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Cyberpunk 20771−2 0−1 Far Cry 59−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry New Dawn12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Forza Horizon 414−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Watch Dogs: Legion4−5 0−1
This is how GTX 660 Ti and GeForce 930M compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- GTX 660 Ti is 328% faster than GeForce 930M
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 660 Ti is 950% faster than the GeForce 930M.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GTX 660 Ti surpassed GeForce 930M in all 49 of our tests.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score 11.32 2.61 Recency 16 August 2012 12 March 2015 Memory bus width 192 64 Pipelines / CUDA cores 1344 384 Memory bandwidth 144.2 14.4 Power consumption [TDP] 150 Watt 33 Watt
The GeForce GTX 660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 930M in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce 930M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Cast your own vote
Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
GeForce 930M
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
User ratings: view and submit
Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.
Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:
Rate NVIDIA GeForce 930M on a scale of 1 to 5:
Questions and comments
Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.