Clarity and Confidence Around Multiple Value Opinions: Value Reconciliations
For clarity and confidence, you need a single source of truth that resolves all conflicting data points and provides a final ruling on the subject property’s valuation. Our intuitive reports simplify your next actions by giving an experienced appraiser the ability to provide a clearly visible reconciled valuation conclusion and variance from the original report. The appraiser can also provide a detailed narrative to support the value points.
Why Clear Capital Value Reconciliations?
Most loan servicers and capital markets investors simply don’t have the resources to perform reconciliation. Even the ones that do often need an additional layer of quality assurance and analysis on existing valuation reports. It is, in fact, one of the most vital steps in the investment process. Value Reconciliations delivered by Clear Capital are also well-suited for times when specific loans within a pool are identified as risky and you need to make heads or tails of the conflicting market data.
What Do Clear Capital Value Reconciliations Provide?
Value reconciliations also bring uniformity, clarity and confidence to the reconciliation process.
1
Access to a specialized network of review appraisers
2
Access to Real Estate Professionals with local MLS access and market knowledge to assist the reconciliation
3
A robust quality control process aided by ClearQCTM
4
Fast turn-around of deliverables that saves time and money
5
A flexible process that supports multiple business cases
Are Value Reconciliations Right for Me?
It all comes down to peace of mind provided quickly and efficiently by value reconciliations.
Loan servicersCapital market participantsInvestorsLearn More
A Clear Capital team member will contact you within one business day.
Definition:
Reconciliation is the process of comparing transactions and activity to supporting documentation. Further, reconciliation involves resolving any discrepancies that may have been discovered.
Purpose:
The process of reconciliation ensures the accuracy and validity of financial information. Also, a proper reconciliation process ensures that unauthorized changes have not occurred to transactions during processing.
Concepts and Best Practices
Accuracy of activity: A good internal control system provides a mechanism to verify that transactions and activity are for the correct purpose and amount, and allowable. | For each type of activity consider documenting the particular information from source documents that is to be compared to the appropriate report. This assists to ensure that transactions are valid and are correct in purpose. [example: determine that for travel reimbursement source documents, the traveler name, destination, purpose of the trip, etc. will be matched to the monthly financial report] Ensure that transactions have been properly authorized. Especially, if the source documents are paper based, review for potential changes to the document between approval and processing of transactions. Ensure that all transactions are allowable. See more specific information: Budget Activity Reconciliation Process Guidelines |
Error correction: Errors and discrepancies, intentional or unintentional, should be detected, investigated and resolved in a timely fashion. | Verify the recording of transactions in a timely manner. Review source documents to assure they are processed and posted in a timely manner by the processing department. If not, follow up with the appropriate central office or processing department. Document a plan for the research and correction of errors or discrepancies of each type of transaction or activity. Communicate these processes and procedures with the appropriate staff. Establish expectations for timeliness of error correction. |
Matching to the source: The oversight of any transaction is strengthened by the process of matching source documentation of the transaction to the appropriate reporting documentation or reporting tool. | See Budget Activity Reconciliation Process Guidelines |
Documenting the process and completion: Reconciliation processes are most effective when they are consistent and thorough. Employees involved in the reconciliation process should be knowledgeable and clear on their responsibilities and expectations. It should be clear to an external reviewer when a reconciliation has been completed. | Be consistent with reconciliation processes. Changing the reconciliation process often leads to undiscovered inaccuracies and potential fraud. Reconciliation should be documented clearly to verify that a review has been done. The reconciliation process and procedures should be documented clearly and communicated. Consider documenting:
|